Fair Funding Review – What Changed and What We Called For
The Government has published its response to the Fair Funding Review 2.0, setting out major reforms to local authority funding from April 2026. These changes aim to create a fairer, evidence-based system that reflects local need and deprivation while simplifying the funding landscape. Below, we outline the key changes and how they compare to the priorities we set out in our submission to the associated consultation.
We are pleased to see that Government has made many of the changes we called for.
What We Called For – and How Government Responded
- Deprivation to be at the heart of funding: We called for deprivation to be central to the new system. The Government has confirmed this, using updated Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) data and weighting deprivation strongly in the Foundation Formula.
- Recognition of homelessness pressures: We highlighted the surge in temporary accommodation costs. The Government has introduced a dedicated formula and consolidated homelessness funding streams.
- Simplification and flexibility: We urged an end to competitive bidding and a move to consolidated grants. The Government will implement this, giving councils greater certainty of future funding levels.
- Area Cost Adjustment (ACA) concerns: We warned that ACA changes could penalise deprived areas. The Government will apply funding floors and restrict the remoteness adjustment to adult social care only, minimising the negative effects we were concerned about.
What Has Changed?
The Government has modernised the funding formulas for the first time in decades, reducing the number of them from 15 to 9. These formulas also now use the 2025 English Indices of Multiple Deprivation, which include income after housing costs, and incorporate population projections to keep allocations current. A new Temporary Accommodation formula has been introduced to reflect rising homelessness costs nationally, and increasingly in the North.
The Area Cost Adjustment (ACA) – a modifier applied to initial funding allocations to account for the different costs of delivering services in different areas – continues to account for labour and property costs. However, the proposed remoteness adjustment will now apply only to Adult Social Care, not across all services. These measures have been replaced with journey times as a more accurate proxy for accessibility costs, ensuring that local authorities are shielded from disproportionate costs of delivery due to sparseness based on credible data. Transitional protections will also aim to cushion any negative impacts.
Continuing with the theme of simplification and consolidation, over 30 separate grants worth a total of £47 billion will be consolidated. Four new ringfenced grants — covering homelessness, public health, crisis and resilience, and children and youth services — will replace multiple smaller streams, while 17 grants will be rolled into the Revenue Support Grant, reducing administrative burdens and ending most competitive bidding.
A notional council tax level will be set at the national average (£2,060 in 2026–27, rising to £2,265 by 2028–29) to ensure full equalisation. Mandatory discounts and exemptions will be fully included in taxbase measures.
Funding changes will be phased in over three years, with funding floors guaranteeing 100% income protection for most authorities and 95% for those significantly above new allocations. The Recovery Grant Guarantee will maintain support for the most deprived areas. This will be achieved through a staged rollout of the new formulas, combined with guaranteed minimum allocations and targeted top-ups for deprived areas to prevent sudden funding losses.
For more details on the Government’s response visit: Fair Funding Review 2.0 government response




