The Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) was launched by Government on 13 April 2022 and this paper briefly summarises the UKSPF Prospectus.

There will be opportunities in the development of local Investment Plans for the housing sector as a whole to work in partnership so that the UKSPF flowing into communities aligns with housing priorities.

Within the short window for submission of investment plans, the housing sector’s collective evidence will support the prioritisation of housing need and for all stakeholders across social housing to contribute their evidence in partnership.

The Northern Housing Consortium will work to highlight areas of good practice and collaboration between our unique membership of Local Authorities, Housing Associations, and ALMOs and ensure the contribution of each is maximised.  We encourage all those working in relation to the UKSPF to share their views and examples of collaborative working by getting in touch.

 

What is the UKSPF?  – The UKSPF, which will succeed the EU structural funds, is designed around three key themes: Community and Place; Supporting Local Businesses and People and Skills.  It complements the Levelling Up Fund with investment covering regenerating high streets, tackling anti-social behaviour or helping more people into jobs. It will be the main source of funding to support employment provision. The initial fund will total £2.6bn between 2022-2025, reaching £1.5bn per year by March 2025 and this funding is central to the Levelling Up agenda. There is also a £559m adult numeracy programme for the whole UK called Multiply[1].

 

Delivery – The Fund operates primarily over the strategic geographies of the Mayoral Combined Authorities (MCAs) and will be planned and delivered by lead authorities that can be either a local authority or a mayoral combined authority.

 

Allocations – The Fund will be allocated via a funding formula rather than a competition through local partnerships. DLUHC said the allocation formula considers local population data and a broadly based measure of need, including factors such as unemployment and income levels.  See Appendix A for Northern regional allocations.

Each allocation will comprise both revenue and capital funding over the next three years and all places will receive an allocation which is conditional upon an investment plan being submitted to the Government for approval.

 

Investment Plans – Local government is being given responsibility for developing investment plans which should set out their local evidence of opportunities and challenges within the three investment priorities. Investment plan submissions will be between 30 June 2022 to 1 August 2022 with first payments expected to lead local authorities from October 2022.

 

Next steps – each place must work with partnerships to develop a plan setting out how they will target their funding on local priorities, against measurable goals.

 

 Appendix A

 UK Shared Prosperity Fund Funding Allocations

 

Local Authority and CA	UKSFP Core	Multiply	Total UKSFP Core
Newcastle	£17,286,922
Northumberland	£19,077,888
North Tyneside	£10,720,251
North of Tyne CA	£47,085,061	£4,128,607	£51,213,668
Barnsley	£7,287,599
Doncaster	£8,960,876
Rotherham	£7,083,489
Sheffield	£15,574,166
South Yorkshire CA	£38,906,130	£7,256,309	£46,162,439
Halton	£3,493,101
Knowsley	£4,500,786
Liverpool	£14,721,188
Sefton	£7,451,277
St Helen’s	£5,409,403
Wirral	£8,804,552
Liverpool City Region	£44,380,307	£8,375,194	£52,755,501
Bradford	£17,177,855
Calderdale	£6,265,510
Kirklees	£13,203,570
Leeds	£21,292,920
Wakefield	£10,063,022
West Yorkshire CA	£68,002,877	£12,483,680	£80,486,557
Bolton	£9,115,364
Bury	£5,526,207
Manchester	£16,613,628
Oldham	£7,578,496
Rochdale	£7,148,507
Salford	£7,393,130
Stockport	£8,117,036
Tameside	£6,569,667
Trafford	£5,850,460
Wigan	£9,938,101
Greater Manchester	£83,850,595	£14,384,692	£98,235,287
Darlington	£6,379,149
Hartlepool	£6,137,059
Middlesbrough	£9,392,874
Redcar & Cleveland	£9,160,627
Stockton on Tees	£11,655,967
Tees Valley	£42,725,676	£3,631,629	£46,357,305
Unitary Authorities	UKSFP Core	Multiply	Total UKSFP Core
Blackburn with Darwen	£5,933,293	£851,021	£6,784,314
Blackpool	£5,114,423	£770,711	£5,885,134
Cheshire East	£11,585,762	£1,535,547	£13,121,309
Cheshire West and Chester	£11,145,008	£1,497,303	£12,642,312
County Durham	£30,830,618	£2,803,077	£33,633,695
East Riding of Yorkshire	£10,419,619	£1,523,637	£11,943,257
Gateshead	£11,634,466	£1,169,621	£12,804,087
Kingston upon Hull	£9,081,013	£1,533,466	£10,614,478
South Tyneside	£8,868,632	£810,389	£9,679,020
Sunderland	£14,936,161	£1,641,730	£16,577,891
Warrington	£6,496,128	£916,581	£7,412,709
York	£5,107,510	£741,291	£5,848,801
Lower tier authorities	UKSFP Core	Multiply	Total UKSFP Core
Adur	£1,000,000	£0
Allerdale	£3,842,852	£0
Barrow-in-Furness	£2,477,528	£0
Burnley	£3,488,102	£0
Carlisle	£4,104,659	£0
Chorley	£4,212,901	£0
Copeland	£2,638,112	£0
Eden	£1,990,203	£0
Fylde	£2,643,292	£0
Hyndburn	£2,943,592	£0
Lancaster	£5,293,336	£0
Pendle	£3,626,135	£0
Preston	£5,243,004	£0
Ribble Valley	£1,967,754	£0
Rossendale	£2,643,864	£0
South Lakeland	£3,845,592	£0
South Ribble	£3,367,878	£0
West Lancashire	£4,256,708	£0
Wyre	£3,929,132	£0
Upper tier local authorities	UKSFP Core	Multiply	Total UKSFP Core
Cumbria[2]	£0	£2,326,432
North Yorkshire[3] comprising: Craven Hambleton Harrogate Richmondshire Ryedale Scarborough Selby	£16,892,952	£2,667,945

[1] ‘Multiply’ is a programme that aims is to increase the levels of functional numeracy in the adult population across the UK.

[2] Restructuring of local government in Cumbria will mean that delivery arrangements will be updated.  Individual plans for each of Cumbria’s district council areas are still needed.

[3] Parliament has agreed legislation to restructure local government in North Yorkshire (excluding York). North Yorkshire County Council, as a ‘continuing authority’ is now tasked with developing a county-wide plan for delivery of UKSPF.

We’ve been reflecting on the sad news of the loss of Steve Douglas earlier this month. The NHC had a long-standing relationship with Steve, particularly through his role in the Commission for Housing in the North. The Commission articulated ambitions that were unique to the North, calling for more local flexibility and the importance of revitalising places; Steve understood both the challenges and solutions, and supported our work in his role as Commissioner.

He was also involved in our events programme, chairing larger conferences and sessions with the RSH. An absolute professional, Steve made a heavy agenda look like easy work, and his passion for housing was clear throughout. If you’ve attended any events where Steve was part of the programme, you will have no doubt seen that passion and professionalism yourself.

The NHC’s Chief Executive, Tracy Harrison, said:

“I’ve had the great pleasure and privilege of working with Steve on several projects over the years, including during his time at the Housing Corporation, at Altair, and when he served on the Commission for Housing in the North. He was consistently professional, kind and generous, and just oozed gravitas! An intelligent man who was deeply committed to his work, and a thoroughly decent, lovely person too. He’s a huge loss to the sector, and I’m just so sad for his family and loved ones.”

His work at St Mungo’s was just the latest evidence of his tireless commitment to improving housing and improving lives, and certainly the North’s housing sector will miss him. Friends and colleagues have paid tribute to Steve in Inside Housing here.

Levelling Up Community Regeneration

 The Government’s Levelling Up agenda has brought a renewed focus on tackling the place-based challenges that hold back many neighbourhoods; inequality and deprivation; poor quality, mismanaged private rented sector housing; and long term vacant and derelict housing. Amongst a number of proposed interventions, the Government plans to introduce measures to empower Local Authorities to bring empty homes back into use.

 In this guest blog, Brighid Carey from Action on Empty Homes discusses their new Community Action Toolkit, and the holistic and community-centred approach to building high quality homes and neighbourhoods that sits at the heart of keeping housing at the heart of a rebalanced country.

NHC members with an interest in the Levelling Up agenda are encouraged to contact Liam Gregson, Member Engagement Manager to discuss how to be involved in our work – liam.gregson@nhc.org.uk

 

Empty Homes – An Enduring Solution

Brighid Carey, Consultancy and Project Manager, Action on Empty Homes

Action on Empty Homes has launched a new Community Action on Empty Homes Toolkit, a guide for local authorities and communities working together with other partners through the process of bringing empty homes into use, to deliver affordable housing for local people. The Toolkit highlights the opportunity for new conversations and new ways of thinking, building creative collaborations to deliver lasting change.

In 2021, the number of empty homes in England stood at 238,306, a level symptomatic of a five year-trend of steadily rising numbers of long-term empty homes, despite a worsening housing crisis. Across the north of England, higher than national average concentrations of empty homes persist: in Scarborough 1 in 13 homes is empty, in Manchester it’s 1 in 30, and in Newcastle the figure is 1 in every 31 homes standing unoccupied. Recognising the scale of concern, the recently published Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill would double council tax on empty homes after one year instead of two, and enable local authorities to charge double council tax on second homes.

For communities, the cost of empty homes may be counted by the impacts on lives. Areas with high numbers of empty homes generally experience higher levels of vandalism and street crime, their residents are more likely to be in low-wage employment, and health and education indicators are poor[1]. Such areas are often characterised by high cost, poor quality privately rented accommodation[2].  Communities become trapped in a spiral of decline that can erode their confidence, lower aspirations and undermine well-being.

Local authorities and housing association have central roles: ·       Get your council to discuss using the Toolkit and supporting communities to bring empty homes into use, to help revitalise neighbourhoods and provide much-needed local housing ·       Housing associations – think about how you can support community action, especially through ethical divestment of street stock ·       Send communities a positive message that you’re willing to collaborate with them and support their empty homes work ·       Get in touch with AEH for more information: brighid.carey(at)emptyhomes.com

It’s time to ask different types of questions when it comes to empty homes. Local authorities and housing providers ask ‘How can we reduce the numbers of empty homes?’ and ‘Will enforcement work this time?’ Communities see things differently. They ask ‘How can we find somewhere decent to live?’, ‘Why are there so many homes going to waste?’  ‘How can we live well here and feel proud when it all looks so uncared for?’ What can we do about it? Communities ask questions about the things that really matter to them – they are concerned about the details of life that can make the difference between feeling well and optimistic or feeling anxious and powerless. Because of their understanding, communities are very well placed to find solutions and act to put things right – for themselves.

AEH has been working alongside communities bringing empty homes into use for the past six years. For the first three of these years, we studied six community groups, some well-established in property renovation, others at the beginning of their journey.  All had recognised unmet housing needs within their communities, had been frustrated by the numbers of homes standing empty, and had decided to do something about it.

The groups were studied represented very diverse communities. Cultures CIC in Stockton on Tees was originally formed to support individuals and groups from BME, migrant and refugee communities and help their social, economic and cultural inclusion. Cultures CIC knew that new entrants to the UK often ended up in poor quality privately rented housing and in low paid work. Working in collaboration with Thirteen HA, Cultures CIC started the process of leasing and renovating empty homes, to provide homes for community members. Cultures CIC had a very small amount of funding but through its outreach work and onsite training, was able to attract donated labour and materials.  Giroscope in Hull had decades of experience in renovating empty homes. Set up in the mid 1980’s to bring empty homes into use, Giroscope has gone from strength to strength, pulling significant capital funding into the areas of Hull where they work.

Of the communities were worked alongside, only one, Giroscope, had actually started out as a housing project. The others were community or neighbourhood groups who wanted both to create more and better affordable housing options for local people, and to address some of the underlying issues that had led to areas having long-term empty homes in the first place.

We found communities to be very effective at addressing these underlying issues. All of the community-led projects in our study provided work experience and on-site training for local people, people with vulnerabilities and people from frequently excluded groups. Some created commercial and office spaces for new community businesses such as bakeries, cycle workshops, gardening services, community shops and venues for training and events. They provided broadband services, advice and information centres and tenancy support, and a range of other services and amenities for local people. Bringing empty homes into use was the catalyst and the medium through which communities delivered the changes they wanted to see, which in turn helped to rebuild the local social and economic infrastructure.

Because communities are ‘intelligent’ about themselves, they understand the roots of issues for local people, and when empowered with leadership and decision-making, can target resources directly towards their resolution, and inspire positive lasting change.

You can download a free copy of the Community Action on Empty Homes Toolkit here.

[1] House Of Commons Briefing Paper 3012 ‘Empty Housing (England)’ (Oct 2020)

[2] Sic

The demise of section 106 and everything else you need to know

The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill, announced in the Queen’s Speech started its progress through Parliament with its first reading on 11 May.

This is one of the flagship bills of the Parliamentary session and, of all the bills announced in the Queen’s Speech, it is likely to be one of the most controversial, enshrining into law the 12 missions of the Levelling Up White Paper to drive local growth, empower local leaders and regenerate areas.

The Bill’s 4 broad objectives are to:

• boost productivity, pay, jobs and living standards by growing the private sector
• spread opportunities and improve public services
• restore a sense of community, local pride and belonging
• empower local leaders and communities

There will be no standalone Planning Bill and planning reform will instead be framed around the Levelling Up programme with the Levelling Up Bill taking forward some of the planning reform outlined in the earlier Planning for the Future White Paper (August 2020).

Six ways the Bill will change planning

1. PLAN-LED – Strong reasons required to override Local Plans
2. BEAUTY – Design codes will have full weight in decisions on development
3. INFRASTRUCTURE – Section 106 replaced with a locally set Infrastructure Levy
4. REGENERATION – New types of Development Corporations and powers for using compulsory purchase
5. LAND SUPPLY – Dropping five-year housing land supply requirements
6. NEIGHBOURHOODS – Street Votes on local design codes and obligation to consider neighbourhood priorities.

This briefing outlines the main provisions of the Bill of relevance to NHC members, and describes the impending shake up to the planning system.

Delivering the levelling up missions

The Government announced in February 2022 that it would introduce a statutory obligation to report annually on the progress towards meeting the Levelling Up missions.  Enshrining the missions into law is the strongest message the Government could give on its intention to deliver the package of proposals.  The missions include plans for housing decency, home ownership, regenerating towns and extending devolution.  With requirements to specify target dates for delivery and report annually on progress, with missions cutting across the whole of Whitehall, the Bill makes a significant statement of intent.

Local Democracy and Devolution

Part 2 of the Bill takes forward the mission for every part of England that wants one to have a devolution deal with powers at or approaching the highest level of devolution, and a simplified, long-term funding settlement by 2030.

It sets out models that will allow bespoke devolution deals, giving local leaders the powers to meet their communities’ needs. The aim is to achieve more joined up services and decision making, greater flexibility over funding and more inward investment. Alongside these new powers, the Bill includes measures to increase the accountability and transparency of local leaders. This will include supporting attendance at overview and scrutiny and audit committees through amending remuneration provisions.

A new type of combined authority model is proposed – ‘combined county authorities’ (CCA) – to be made up of upper tier local authorities (county councils and unitary authorities) only. Upper tier local authorities will be expected to work closely with their district councils, who will be able to be ‘non-constituent members’ of a CCA.

Improving the Planning Process – a plan-led system

The whole thrust of the planning reforms is that applications will be genuinely plan-led.

Clause 83 of the Bill gives Local Plans more weight when making decisions on applications so that there must be strong reasons to override the plan, with the emphasis being “unless material considerations strongly indicate otherwise”. The same weight will be given to other parts of the development plan which are given full legal force.  Some plan policies (such as general heritage protection) will be set out nationally with no need for local replication.  There will be a new power to prepare supplementary plans to replace the ‘supplementary planning documents.’  A new duty will be placed on infrastructure providers to engage in the process. A series of ‘Gateway’ checks during production will help to spot and correct any problems at an early stage.

The ‘duty to cooperate’ will be repealed and replaced with an ‘alignment test’ across groups of local authorities set out in national policy to collaborate to produce a voluntary spatial development strategy, where they wish to provide strategic planning policies for issues that cut across their areas. Groups of authorities will be able to collaborate to produce a voluntary spatial development strategy, where they wish to provide strategic planning policies for issues that cut across their areas.

The Bill will remove the requirement for authorities to maintain a rolling five-year supply of deliverable land for housing, where their plan is up to date. The intention is to limit speculative development.

Local plans should be produced within 30 months and new Local Plan Commissioners may be deployed to support or ultimately take over plan-making if local planning authorities fail to meet their statutory duties.

The process for producing the plans will be supported with new digital powers to allow more standardised data to inform plan-making.  The Bill includes a new power to prescribe the use of specific types of planning data software and require that electronic planning applications comply with “particular technical standards or specifications.”

Neighbourhood plans will be given greater weight in planning decisions and the Bill introduces a new neighbourhood planning tool called a ‘neighbourhood priorities statement’ which the local authority will be obliged to consider when preparing its local plan. Residents will be able to take part in new ‘street votes’ to make proposals to extend or redevelop their properties in line with their design preferences.

Infrastructure Levy

The Bill follows through with the proposal to replace the current system of developer contributions through section 106 with a mandatory, and locally determined Infrastructure Levy.

The rates will be set as a percentage of gross development value rather than based on floorspace, as with the Community Infrastructure Levy at present. Going forward, the Community Infrastructure Levy will be restricted to Greater London and Wales.

Infrastructure delivery strategies prepared locally will determine where and how infrastructure spending is allocated.

Following responses to the consultation on the 2020 White Paper, the Bill confirms that charges will be determined locally by local planning authorities who will be able to set different rates within their area. For example, different rates could be set for brownfield and greenfield sites within a local authority boundary to help boost development in certain areas.

The Bill includes a framework in Schedule 11 committing to the Levy securing at least as much affordable housing as developer contributions do now.

Local authorities will be able to determine the portion of the levy they receive in-kind as onsite affordable homes using a ‘right to require’ thereby removing the role of negotiation in determining levels of onsite affordable housing.

Further regulation will also consider how the levy will be applied to registered provider-led schemes and will detail a ‘retained role’ for Section 106 agreements to support the delivery of infrastructure on the largest sites.

While the Bill provides the framework for the new levy, much of the detail will be set out in future regulations.  The new non-negotiable and locally set Infrastructure Levy will be introduced through a phased ‘test and learn’ rollout and a consultation will be coming soon on the detail.

Beautiful places and environmental outcomes

Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) will be scrapped and replaced by a new “outcomes-based” approach to examining the likely environmental impact of proposed projects and plans.

A consultation will be issued shortly on changes to the National Planning Policy Framework to improve environmental outcomes. This will include changes to embed the Environment Act’s reforms into plan-making.

The Bill will require every local planning authority to produce a design code for its area. These codes will have full weight in making decisions on development. The ‘Office for Place’ will support local planning authorities to deliver design codes and better design outcomes.

Measures in the Bill will also strengthen the role the planning system plays in protecting the historic environment and puts Historic Environment Records on a statutory basis, placing a new duty on local authorities to maintain one for their area.

Regeneration

This Bill will make provision for a new type of Urban Development Corporation, with the objective of regenerating its area and accountable to local authorities in the area rather than the Secretary of State.  It also updates the planning powers available to development corporations, so that they can become local planning authorities.

Part 7 of the Bill on Compulsory Purchase puts beyond doubt local authorities’ powers for using compulsory purchase for regeneration.

Measures will be introduced to reform land compensation to ensure that fair compensation is paid for the value attributable to prospective planning permission (‘hope value’).

The Bill will also give local authorities an important new power to instigate high street rental auctions of vacant commercial properties in town centres.

Local Planning Capacity

The package of reforms will require an increase in skills for local authorities, for example digital and design skills and Government is carrying out work to assess the need for sufficient skills, capability and talent for the new system to run effectively.

To improve capacity in the local planning system, the Bill announced that planning fees will increase for major and minor applications by 35% and 25% respectively. This will be consulted on in the summer before changes are made through secondary legislation at the earliest opportunity following the consultation.

The Government has stated that increasing fees must lead to a better service and the existing planning performance framework will be expanded to measure performance across a broader range of measures.

DLUHC has committed to continue to work with sector experts to develop a planning skills strategy for local planning authorities.  A sector working group is discussing capacity issues now that the package of proposals is available.

NHC View

We welcome the provisions of the Bill to strengthen and add to the tools that can be used to deliver regeneration and make good use of brownfield land. The Bill will enhance compulsory purchase powers, make it easier to establish locally-led development corporations and improve transparency about the ownership and control of land. Housing on brownfield sites can deliver on many of the Government’s levelling-up priorities: restoring pride by tackling eyesore sites, creating opportunity through jobs in remediation and construction, and boosting living standards by creating new homes for sale and rent that cost less to run.

Reforms to section 106, and the creation of a locally-set non-negotiable levy will need careful assessment.  While not without its flaws, the existing system allows for flexibility and greater certainty on securing affordable housing.  It is good to see that the new Infrastructure Levy will be set at a local level – this is something we pushed for when the levy was first proposed.  Land values and development costs vary significantly across the country and therefore a mechanism that levy’s contributions to infrastructure and other planning obligations must be response to local conditions if it is to be part of a levelling up programme.

The focus remains on delivering affordable homes and there is a concern that the levy will be less prescriptive than section 106 in its requirements for affordable housing on site. In the North, 31% of all units completed since 2015/16 were achieved from developer contributions and there is still a question about how in practice the number of genuinely affordable homes currently provided though section 106 will really be ensured, particularly in low value markets. We welcome the phased ‘test and learn’ approach to the introduction of the levy to ensure the system delivers for all parts of the country.

Local planning authorities must be provided with the resources to manage the levy and ensure that obligations are delivered.  It is encouraging that work is underway to develop a skills strategy, but we know that Northern local authorities have been disproportionately impacted by reductions in spending since 2010. This could undermine their capacity to undertake the planning and housing reforms and support for skills and new roles will become more pressing. Upfront support will also be required during the transitional period where there would have to be two planning systems running simultaneously.

There is still some way to go for the Bill and there could be amendments following various consultations. Changes to regulations, guidance and wider support for councils, and ways to involve residents will be just as important as the new legislation. Also, we will need to wait to see what is covered by national development management policies.

With the Bill just starting its journey through Parliament, a significant amount of detail remains to be worked through and the NHC looks forward to working with Government and our Members to help shape the detail.

Next steps

Government will be consulting on:

• Changes to the National Planning Policy Framework including the removal of the requirement for authorities to maintain a rolling five-year supply of deliverable land for housing, and on the National Development Management Policies
• Detail of the Infrastructure Levy and changes to compulsory purchase compensation
• Consultation on the new system of Environmental Outcomes Reports
• Consultation on the quality standards that Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects
• Proposals for changes to planning fees.

Transition plans will be set out but in broad terms changes to planning procedures will begin to take place from 2024.

Book your place at the Levelling Up Conference: Housing at the Heart of a Rebalanced Country – Thursday 14th July at Hilton Leeds City.  The conference will include keynote speakers, good practice case studies, and a core focus on networking and collaboration.

We’ve launched our ambitious new corporate plan – it sets out how we’ll support you over the next three years to help you create better homes and places.

Created by our full staff team alongside our member-led Board, our Corporate Plan has been shaped by our members – through engagement activity, shared future challenges and our perceptions research – here is a deeper dive into our plans over the next three years.

At the heart of our Corporate Plan is your unrivalled member experience. We will continue to build strong relationships with our members, delivering solutions which fit your evolving needs and ensuring excellence in the development and delivery of our services.

Our unique membership of councils, housing associations, ALMOs and combined authorities means we can bring together professionals across the housing sector to help create better homes and places. We will create a community of support, networking and industry insight across the membership.

We will build on our existing and effective partnerships, working with those who share our members’ interests to maximise reach and impact (recognising the integral link between housing, health and other sectors), whilst ensuring best use of our own resources.

We will use collaboration opportunities to expand our range of solutions and access others’ expertise, driving better choice and value for members and driving income for reinvestment in the NHC and Consortium Procurement.  We will work with other consortia strategically to use our collective power to aggregate demand, stimulate local supply chains, build skills and expertise and offer regional solutions. We will strengthen relationships with our key supply partners, utilising their expertise in the support of our members’ needs – we aim to complement rather than duplicate.

We will influence on the priorities that are shared by you – meeting the Net Zero challenge and putting housing at the heart of a rebalanced country. Through our influencing activities we will secure change using a robust evidence base on the issues that matter to members, we will strengthen our relationships with decision makers and policy shapers locally, regionally and nationally, ensuring the people who count respond to our core policy objectives.

Through engagement with members we will demonstrate our focus on members’ key agenda items outside of influencing priorities. While we are committed to our influencing priorities shared by our northern members – net zero and rebalancing – our wider engagement activity reflects the diverse and wide-ranging issues our members face. Through our events and engagement programme we will support you to navigate challenges, share best practice and deliver excellent services.

We will continue to offer a rewarding, supportive place to work where we invest in people, they can be themselves and fulfil their potential – an organisation we are all proud to be a part of. We will build on our organisational structure and support framework that enables our staff team to thrive, act autonomously, competently, and become subject matter experts in their field.

We will ensure that Sustainability, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, and Wellbeing are considered at the heart of everything we do as an organisation – informing and supporting our members and the way we work internally.

Over the next three years our new plan will guide the delivery of our mission: to bring together housing in the North to develop insight, influence and solutions for our members.  We’d love to receive member feedback email  kate.maughan@northern-consortium.org.uk.