Preparing for the General Data Protection Regulation in Social Housing

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will change the way tenant data is dealt with. From 25th May 2018, all organisations will need to ensure they comply with the new data protection legislation. At this stage the social housing sector needs to be aware of the changes and should start reviewing documentation, and whether processes will comply with the new requirements.

One new requirement is that of “accountability” – whereby organisations will need to show the way in which they are complying with data protection principles.

Requirements will change on key consent principles in the GDPR which will include:

  • Building customer trust and engagement.
  • Making sure that the consents you ask individuals for match your consent practices.
  • Offering individuals “genuine choice and control”.
  • Making statements of consent very clear and specific.
  • Being “granular” in the consent you’re asking for – a “blanket” consent under a generic statement isn’t good enough.
  • Naming the third parties who will rely on the consent.
  • Allowing people to withdraw their consent.
  • Keeping consent practices under review.

Emphasis of the principles is clear enough – manage personal information responsibility, make clear requests for what you require and offer people a genuine choice over whether to actually give their consent. A further aim of the GDPR is to prompt a cultural shift in the way that consent to sharing information is given. Consent should be separate from main terms and conditions, and it should require “clear affirmative action” from the individual giving it.

The Return of Customer Profiling

Customer profiling has climbed housing providers’ list of priorities again recently after an apparent lull. More than ever, finances are tight in our sector and providers must be sure that resources are targeted where they will make the greatest impact. Painting a detailed picture of customers can help do that. From a purely commercial perspective, one of the most important parts of any business is to understand who your customers are. Every time you scan your loyalty card at the supermarket, the store is collecting information about you and what you like to buy. A twist on this ‘getting to know you’ approach can be put to good use in housing services.

The information gleaned from profiling a tenant base can be extremely valuable, not only in terms of where to focus resources and targeting support for customers in need, but in many other commercially beneficial ways. One of the findings from the soon-to-be-published fourth NHC Universal Credit Research report is that over two-thirds of respondents have or are planning to carry out a customer profiling exercise of their tenant base to determine those at risk of falling into arrears or of having difficulty paying their rent. This will help those organisation to pinpoint where claimant support should be targeted and thereby maximise rental income.

But how do you go about profiling your customers? There are valuable sources of guidance for carrying out profiling exercises but a single approach will not meet all requirements of every organisation. The desired outcomes of the project should determine how the organisation goes about collecting the intelligence required. Housing organisations’ resources are finite and there may already be valuable information on your systems perhaps from tenancy sign-up about household composition or disability, or from information collected since on vulnerable people. This may be all you need.

Some organisations embark on large-scale studies of their tenant base, commissioning external consultants to collect wide-ranging information to pinpoint certain tenant types and segment them based on demographic, behavioural or value-based characteristics.

There are many considerations when embarking on a customer profiling exercise and NHC will be holding a free member roundtable in York on Tuesday, 14th November where these considerations will be addressed using real-life examples. For more information and to book onto the event click here.

Data Blog – Shifting Tenure Patterns in the North

In February’s Housing White Paper the Government moved away from its broad focus on encouraging home ownership, something that was front and centre of the David Cameron administration, in favour of helping to fix the housing market so that more people across the country can have the security of a decent place to live. We examine the latest available data from the Labour Force Survey and from NOMIS to illustrate tenure make-up in the North and how it has changed over recent years.

Region

Despite commitments and incentives from the White Paper to continue publicising the Help to Buy equity loan programme, the number of households owning their own home has been falling since 2006, and in response there is a significant increase in private rental,both nationally and in the North (as the figure below shows). After accounting for one-quarter of the housing market in 1996, social housing saw a decline in popularity until 2011 when it has remained constant at 19%.

Tenure Changes in the North 1996-2016

Source: Labour Force Survey

Generally, Tenure patterns vary by region but  private renting remains consistent across the North. The Government now recognises the need for security of tenure in the private rented sector and is committed to exploring “family friendly tenancies of three years minimum duration”. This comes after a significant increase in private renting in all parts of the country. In the North East in particular, private renting has more than doubled from 2006 to 2016 albeit from a relatively small base number of 88,000.

Change in Private Renting 2006-2016

Change in Private Renting 2006-2016

Source: Labour Force Survey

As the figure above shows, other parts of the North and the Midlands have seen large increases in the private rented sector but changes in other tenures are not so straightforward. Six out of the nine English regions saw a decrease in owner-occupation since 2016 – some relatively substantial and mostly concentrated in the three Northern regions (see Yorkshire and Humber) – along with the Midlands.

Elsewhere, with the exception of the South East, owner occupation has grown, most notably in the East of England.

Change in Owner-occupation 2006-2016

Change in Owner-occupation 2006-2016

Source: Labour Force Survey

There is no pattern to be gleaned from an examination of the change to social renting by region. There were increases in four regions and similarly, decreases in another four. As far as the North is concerned, the largest decrease (-8.4%) in social renting in the country was in the North East and there was a slight increase in Yorkshire and Humber.

Change in Social Renting 2006-2016

Change in Social Renting 2006-2016

Source: Labour Force Survey

There was also a large decrease in social renting in London where there has been increases in both private renting and owner-occupation (above).

Age

Private renting is dominated by younger people with over half of private renters aged between 16 and 34 and this decreases with age.

Tenure in the North by Age Group

Age 16 to 34 Age 35 to 49 Age 50 to 64 Age 65 and over Total
Owner Occupied 15% 42% 38% 5% 100%
Private renting 52% 32% 14% 2% 100%
Social renting 27% 41% 28% 4% 100%

Source: NOMIS

The higher the age range, the greater the proportion of owner-occupiers and as those in the younger owner-occupied age groups get older, so the proportion of older people in this sector will grow. There is a greater spread of ages living in social rented accommodation with almost the same proportion of 16-34 year olds and 50-64 year olds living in the social sector.

It is clear that there has been a shift in tenure patterns in recent years with the private rented sector now playing almost as significant a role in the northern housing market as the social rented sector. Affordability of owner-occupation continues to be an issue, despite government attempts to counter this, and its popularity is dwindling. However, after a reported slump in the buy-to-let market, we may see younger people in a stronger position to buy their own homes in the coming years and a return to the pre-2006 status quo. Either way, local plans will need to be robust in ensuring markets are balanced and as suggested in the White Paper, may need to be reviewed every five years to keep up with the moving market. As devolution deals evolve across the northern regions, strategic sites could be allocated across larger geographical areas determining the tenure balance over local authority boundaries.

The NHC has recently constituted a working group for members on the private rented sector that seeks to share best practice and act as a forum for those working in the PRS to share ideas and problems with colleagues. With the share of the PRS growing, it is important that issues around quality, regulation and driving up standards are explored for the benefit of members and those living in private rented accommodation. The next meeting is expected to take place in October or November. To be notified when the date is confirmed, please sign up to receive the NHC’s event update.

Estate Regeneration Funding Announced

More than 40 housing estates across the North are set to benefit from a significant investment from the £32 million pound Estate Regeneration Fund to help kick-start their regeneration. The funding awards for northern registered providers, which account for 42% of all the bids, represent a significant investment in regeneration in the North of England and echoes conclusions made by the Commission for Housing in the North of a need to prioritise regeneration in the North.

Northern registered providers benefiting from the fund include Thirteen who were successful in bidding for funds to regenerate four estates and South Liverpool Homes who won funding to regenerate the South Parade estate. Successful local authorities include Gateshead Council, City of York Council and High Peak Borough Council with awards of £373,000, £260,000 and £80,000 respectively.

In a statement, DCLG notes that the funding “would help speed up regenerations schemes in early stages” and will help “to provide thousands of new homes from the carefully planned redesign of estates”.

In addition to the £32 million released, £140 million in loan funding is available between 2017 and 2020 to encourage investment in regeneration from the private sector to help build places that work for everyone. The £140 million loan fund was initially announced last year, and is designed to cover costs such as land assembly, leaseholder buy-outs, re-housing costs, demolition, and preparatory construction works.

Jo Boaden, Chief Executive of the Northern Housing Consortium said “the announcement of new funding for estate regeneration in the North is good news and I am particularly pleased to see a high number of northern housing associations and local authorities awarded funding to begin work improving communities and regenerating estates”.

“Regeneration remains a key issue for the North of England and it is something that is essential to growing housing markets in the northern regions. This was something that was born out in the NHC’s recent Commission for Housing in the North report which we hope to expand on in the coming months.”

A full list of those bids receiving funding can be found here.